From Handwork to Human Capital

A Discourse Analysis of Design and Technology Education Policy in England, 1900 to the Present

Authors

  • Matt McLain Liverpool John Moores University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3384/ecp213.1246

Keywords:

accountability, curriculum policy, design and technology education, discourse analysis, England, national curriculum, policymaking

Abstract

This paper offers a critical discourse analysis informed discussion of UK policy texts that have shaped design and technology (D&T) education in England from the early twentieth century to the present, drawing exclusively on the provided annotated corpus of Acts, statutory orders, curriculum documents, and white papers. Treating these texts as discursive artefacts, the analysis traces how D&T has been problem‑framed, how learners and teachers have been constructed, and which policy levers (statutory status, accountability measures, and assessment architectures) have materialised these framings in schools. Five eras are identified: (i) handwork for character and citizenship (1904–1918); (ii) post‑war technical modernity (1944-1949); (iii) the invention of D&T as design capability within the national curriculum for England (1988-1999); (iv) standards, choice, and accountability with the marginalisation of non-English Baccalaureate subjects (2002-2016); and (v) skills/productivity and technical pathways (2016-present). The corpus also evidences the consolidation of statutory frameworks (1996), primary‑phase turbulence (2009), and the reconfiguration of vocational pathways (2011). A sustained policy contradiction is visible: economic and skills strategies valorise design and technical capability, while accountability regimes simultaneously decentre D&T at Key Stage 4. A coherent national settlement requires realigning performance measures or restoring statutory guarantees, so school‑level incentives match national ambitions.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-14